Print

Lamont & Lawrence Garrison

Lawrence Garrison with his grandmother, mother and great Uncle
Lamont & Lawrence Garrison

Lamont H. Garrison
#42689-083
Federal Sentence: 19 years
Offense: Powder cocaine (10 kg) and crack cocaine conspiracy (500 g)
Priors: None
Sentenced: 1998 
Year of Birth: 1973
Projected Release Date: 7/08/2015
 
Lawrence B. Garrison
#42784-084
Federal Sentence: 15 years
Offense: Powder cocaine (10 kg) and crack cocaine
conspiracy (500 g)
Priors: None
Sentenced: 10/16/98 
Year of Birth: 1973
Projected Release Date: 2/08/2012
 
Nature of Offense: The proprietor of an auto body shop in Maryland was arrested as a major player in a 20-person powder and crack cocaine operation.  To reduce his sentence, he implicated others in the conspiracy.  Two of them were twin brothers Lawrence and Lamont Garrison.  The shop owner testified that he supplied the Garrisons with one to two kilos of cocaine every week for 10 weeks in 1996 and again in 1997. Other conspirators soon followed, testifying that they too had witnessed some of these transactions. 
 
According to Lawrence and Lamont, their contact with the shop owner was solely for business.  A mechanic was performing extensive work on both their grandmother’s and uncle's cars.  The mechanic’s phone wasn’t working, so the twins would call his adjacent auto body shop, and he would hand the phone to the mechanic.  The twins’ mother and uncle both confirm this since they also called repeatedly about the car.
 
There were no drugs, drug paraphernalia, or any other evidence of drug conspiracy found on the Garrisons or in their home.  They had no criminal record or substance abuse history. Unlike the twins' codefendants, no proof existed that Lawrence or Lamont “derived money and other benefits” from two years of supposedly dealing large quantities of drugs. In fact, both brothers were living in their mother’s house and owed thousands of dollars in college loans: Lamont's bill alone totaled $40,000. 
 
Sure of their innocence, the Garrisons went to trial.  They did not have enough money to hire one lawyer, let alone two, so they both settled with court appointed attorneys who, according to their mother, “were relaxed with the case” and “fell asleep during the trial.”  The twins’ mother reports that although the prosecutors obtained records of phone calls taking place, the phone lines were never tapped to record the actual conversations, a key factor that could have exonerated the twins. The government argued the brothers couldn’t have merely been calling Abea about the car because they called too frequently, sometimes at strange hours, and on Abea’s cell phone and pager, not his business phone.
 
Sentences of Others Involved: The shopowner (and target of the investigation) benefited tremendously from implicating Lawrence and Lamont. He received only three years in prison even though he was heavily involved in the cocaine operation.
 
Personal Background: Lamont and Lawrence were arrested just months after their graduation from Howard University.  Both had worked part-time for five years to pay their tuition, and both were excellent students who were planning to become lawyers.  At the time of his arrest, Lamont was working full-time as a juvenile counselor in Maryland, and both he and his brother had previously worked at the Department of Energy and the Department of Justice. 
 
The Garrisons' friends, family, and teachers were all shocked when the twins were not acquitted of the charges.  Everyone who knew them was positive that Lawrence and Lamont were never involved with drugs or crime.  A family friend who has known the brothers for years wrote to their judge, “They would not have risked all they had worked so hard for, or their futures, on some immediate and temporary gratification.  These boys are not the type and were not raised that way.” 
 
Compiled from prisoner information, Presentence Investigation Report, and The Hilltop 7/29/99 dl updated AP 4/15/08